Overcoming Writer’s Block: Advice From A Very Smart Man

by Nuno on January 29, 2009

Mark Dery, a man much smarter than I (Time Magazine called him one of “the smartest people we know”) was one of my college journalism professors.

Back in 2005, three years after graduating from college, in the midst of writer’s paralysis, I reached out to Prof. Dery looking for inspiration.

Following is his response.  I don’t have permission to publish it so I hope he doesn’t mind but I’d be selfish not to share it.

“So sorry to hear.  Writer’s block, in my experience, is usually the result of excruciating self-consciousness — the grotesque swelling of the Superego, to the point where it shoots down every idea before you even put pen to paper.

“Stop second-guessing yourself. Stop assuming someone, somewhere, has said it better than you ever could. Tell yourself that being indelibly YOU is more important than being the best. Fact is, there’s no such thing as The Best.

“Once, when I was interviewing the novelist Paul Bowles (THE SHELTERING SKY), I asked who he thought was the best writer, or some similarly inane, jejune question. He sighed wearily and said, in effect, that my question was meaningless. ‘Who’s good?,’ he said. ‘Bach? Beethoven? Gogol? Balzac? The ones history winnows out for canonization? How many geniuses, better than them by far, died unknown? By definition, we can never know. So how can the question be answered? And how can we judge everyone, everywhere, at all times, with the same aesthetic yardstick?’ (I’m paraphrasing, here.)

“Remember, finally, that soldiering on is the better part of success. Writers are people who write. If you intend to write, write. Better to suck and be productive than to sentence yourself to silence because your standards are unattainable.

“Sit down at the typer and grind out that pound of flesh, every day. Let history, and people you value, and the almighty marketplace, decide, over time, if you should keep soldiering on. Give it three years. If, after writing every day for three years, you haven’t sold a single piece and people you respect offer little comfort in the way of compliments, *and if you aren’t sustained by the sheer joy of writing despite those grim truths*, give it up. But not until you’ve typed your fingers bloody for three straight years. That’s my sage counsel, for what it’s worth.”

Wow.

Photo credit: Laineys Repertoire

Viewing 1 Comment

    • ^
    • v
    I'm not going to be the one to say he's right, but he's right.

    I think the great writers, even those who write solely online content, have taken this advice to heart in order to get where they are today. My guess is that if you write a lot, you probably also read a lot. They kind of go hand in hand. So, to the end, every time they sit down to write they must immediately think to themselves, "wait a sec, I've read this somewhere before."

    "Why am I going to spend an hour writing on something that's already been written on?"

    And then they do it anyway. And we all sit and read it and the cycle continues. That's fine with me.

    Great writing is a commodity these days. I think the differentiator is experience. I would much rather read something from someone's who's actually been there and done that than from someone who just writes as if they had. The reason is because every experience is unique to the person who experienced it, and therefore their expression of that experience has no choice but to be unique - and in turn so will the content.

    Now I just need to practice what I preach... the hard part.
 

Trackbacks

(Trackback URL)

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus